2004 – 67th WIOA Victorian Conference
1 and 2 September, 2004, Sports and Leisure Centre – Wodonga
Proudly Supported by: North East Water, DSE – Water Sector Services & Australian Pollution Engineering
Papers listed in order of the conference program
UPGRADE, COMMISSIONING AND PARTNERSHIPS AT WEST WODONGA WWTP Peter Tolsher – Purac
+Abstract
This paper describes the history & background, the selection process – Authority’s expectations of an operating company, combining the old plant with the new, commissioning – hazop with site operators, introducing a site specific quality system, plant commissioning and why partnerships? It also describes the plant upgrade by PURAC in 2002/3 to provide advanced secondary treatment by Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) process followed by UV disinfection. The plant also includes an advanced treatment process for production of high quality reclaimed effluent for re-use on and off site.
-Close
CHLORINE GAS V’s SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE Teresa Travaglia – Orica
+Abstract
Despite the outstanding safety record of the chlorine gas some water companies are considering converting their disinfection systems from chlorine gas to sodium hypochlorite due to the perceived safety benefit. The health risks associated with sodium hypochlorite, the increasing number of safety incidents occurring, the environmental damage from spills and the potential to greatly increase the cost of disinfection should be considered prior to conversion. This paper discusses the issues associated with the application of chlorine based disinfection products for water and waste water.
-Close
BALLARAT WATER TREATMENT – THE MANGANESE CHALLENGE David Both – United Water International
+Abstract
-Close
DEVELOPMENT OF OPERATIONAL MANUALS Jason Whittaker – Goulburn Valley Water
+Abstract
This paper will outline the history dictating the need for the Manuals, as well as the key processes undertaken during the development of the manuals including:
- GVW’s requirements.
- Developing a manual template and data management structure.
- Staff ownership.
- Data collection process from the facilities including operator input.
- Review process by operators and technical staff
- Ongoing review/update process including further development to allow users to access GVW’s Operational System.
-Close
SECONDARY DISINFECTION “TRIM” UNITS Derek Braden – C-Tech Services
+Abstract
-Close
PROCESS OPTIMISATION OF BIOSOLIDS DEWATERING Michael Naughton – Barwon Water
+Abstract
Since March 2001 the dewatered sludge has been stored at Western Treatment Plant in Werribee approximately 62 kilometres away. In February 2004 a treatment process commenced to dry and stabilise the sludge into biosolids. The biosolids are now being reused beneficially as a soil improver on agricultural land. This process is an interim step toward Barwon Water’s long term biosolids management project.
The costs for transport and processing of the biosolids are based on the wet tonnage of the dewatered sludge produced. It is very important to ensure that the sludge dewatering operation produces the driest possible sludge cake. The paper discusses the problems faced by the operators of the plant, the solutions that were applied and the outcomes achieved.
-Close
A NEW APPROACH TO WET WELL CLEANING Gary Smith – Southern Cross Laboratories
+Abstract
Whilst these approaches have proven effective there are a number of drawbacks, most notably:
- intensive labour requirement
- the OH&S implications of wet well entry
- high water consumption
- potential fouling of downstream sewers
A new and innovative approach to the problem of wet well cleaning has been developed in which a specially developed biological product is sprayed into the wet well. This new approach has proven highly effective and overcomes the drawbacks of conventional spray systems e.g.
- water consumption is reduced and
- there is no fouling of downstream sewers as the greases are degraded biologically
Capital costs are comparable to conventional spray systems and operating costs are offset through savings in labour. To illustrate these points a case study itemising capital, installation and operating costs and the results and savings achieved is presented.
-Close
ASSET PROTECTION & ODOUR CONTROL USING ODOURLOCK® Andrew Dowd – Orica
+Abstract
Orica Watercare developed an odour mapping process of the sewerage network to establish a thorough understanding of the problem and the council’s requirements and ultimately a comprehensive control strategy. The implementation of Odourlock® dosing at 38 sites commenced in August 2002. Analysis at the main pumping station indicated a 95% reduction in hydrogen sulphide concentration. The reduction in H2S concentration coincided with a reduction in the number of odour complaints by 50%. Further, reduced H2S(g) levels within the network minimised corrosion of valuable sewerage infrastructure thereby decreasing the requirements for infrastructure maintenance and repair and hence costs.
-Close
MEETING WHO GUIDELINES FOR DRINKING WATER QUALITY AFTER THE 2003 BUSHFIRES IN NORTH EAST VICTORIA Bruce Tyler – North East Water
+Abstract
Staff members from other regions in the Authority were called in to assist in running a 24-hour roster, which was maintained for a few days until the threat had past. Once the flames were gone and we were left with a smoky haze and a charred landscape, our troubles were not all gone.
-Close
DELIVERING SUSTAINABLE URBAN WATER RECYCLING – AN ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATOR’S PERSPECTIVE OF DUAL PIPE NETWORKS Suzy Sarkis – EPA Victoria
+Abstract
There are a number of residential dual pipe schemes operating in Australia and overseas. In NSW, the Rouse Hill development area has implemented a recycled water system for garden watering and toilet flushing. The City of St Petersburg in Florida, USA, is one of the best known reuse schemes, having been in operation since 1977. Other examples in the development stages include Mawson Lakes in South Australia and Pimpama Coomera in Queensland. In Victoria there are a number of apparently committed urban dual pipe schemes including Aurora Development in Epping North, Sandhurst and Eynesbury Estate. Schemes being investigated include developments at Cranbourne and Wyndham.
While recycled water should be viewed primarily as a valuable resource, potential microbiological and chemical risks have resulted in the use of recycled water being subject to strong regulatory oversight. Effective regulatory oversight is important to maintain community and industry confidence and thus support for recycling, ensure protection of health and the environment, encourage innovative approaches and provide stable frameworks for investment in recycling.
This paper discusses the potential contaminant issues that need to be considered and managed in establishing a dual pipe scheme. This paper also highlights the processes being undertaken to provide the regulatory oversight needed to facilitate residential dual pipe schemes.
-Close
THE PUBLIC AND BIOSOLIDS – COMMUNICATE OR PERISH Allen Gale – Goulburn Valley Water
+Abstract
By way of example, the USA had been “cruising” comfortably for a decade or more based on US EPA’s Part 503 (40 CFR Part 503), which was promulgated in 1993. Over the last five years, and particularly the last two, there has been a shift in public acceptance of land application of biosolids, the roles governing its application and the credibility of US EPA with respect to biosolids management.
There currently are some 40-50 separate legal and/or public challenges to land application of biosolids across the USA. There are also some very well coordinated, educated and briefed proponents objecting to land application of biosolids on a very wide scale.
Public perceptions of biosolids being a dangerous product are resulting in a flurry of activity within the USA water industry, driving the industry towards having to produce the highest quality biosolids regardless of the application. Local authorities with little qualifications in determining what is appropriate are placing significant restrictions and/or bans on land application of biosolids. The potential outcome for the USA water industry is billions of dollars of extra expenditure on biosolids management that has not been justified.
-Close
pH BUFFERING IN THE GREAVES CREEK WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Carolyn Haupt – Sydney Water
+Abstract
Following commissioning of Greaves Creek WFP in 1991 and the commencement of water quality testing in the system, the lack of pH buffering in the raw water source (alkalinity < 4.0mg/L) became a significant issue. The original lime dosing system at the plant was designed for pH control with little regard to alkalinity (buffering capacity). As a result, whilst the plant met process guidelines (pH 7.0-8.0), the low buffering capacity meant there was a significant increase in pH at the extremities of the distribution system.
A series of process changes and optimisation projects were initiated to improve the consistency of pH control and the pH buffering of the final water. By controlling the pH buffering capacity of final water at Greaves Creek WFP, there has been a significant reduction in the pH levels at the extremities of the supply system.
-Close
INVESTIGATIONS FOR A MAJOR WATER MINING PROJECT AT PRINCES PARK, MELBOURNE Muthu Muthukaruppan – City West Water
+Abstract
-Close
CLASS A APPROVAL PROCESS FOR THE WODONGA WATER RECYCLING SCHEME Ian Reimers – North East Water
+Abstract
The approval and verification process for the plant involved:
- Consultation with both the EPA and DHS;
- Incorporating principals from the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point system (HACCP) by adapting the existing ISO9001 Quality Management System at the WWPP and;
- Conducting a plant verification trial.
The verification trial was conducted over an 8-week period to establish the minimum rate of pathogen reduction at critical control points in the treatment process. The results of this trial had demonstrated some linkage of pathogen reduction at critical control points to the surrogate parameters of chlorine and turbidity. Linkages of the surrogates to protozoa reduction were more difficult to establish due to issues with laboratory detection limits. It was found that the ability to monitor these surrogates in real time ensures that if water quality deviates significantly from set points, corrective action can be undertaken immediately, ensuring health targets are met.
-Close
THE USE OF A CUSTOMER PANEL TO ASSESS WATER QUALITY CHANGES Jillian Busch – Gippsland Water
+Abstract
To assess the success or otherwise of the treatments, an untrained customer reference panel of 29 households was formed to provide feedback on their experiences with the water over a 3.5 month period. The selection and management of the group was developed and results indicate that the group could recognise different stages of the trial, including interventions that were successful in improving the aesthetic quality of the water. The panel also highlighted an unexpected difference between water sourced from different bores.
-Close
TRADE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS – COOPERATIVE COMPLIANCE Jason McGregor – Central Highlands Water
+Abstract
-Close